The U.S. government's delay in suspending the de minimis tariff exemption has left small direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands in limbo. Originally set to take effect on February 4, 2025, the suspension of Section 321—which allows duty-free imports for shipments under $800—has been postponed, giving Chinese sellers like Shein, Temu, and Wish a continued cost advantage.
While this delay provides short-term relief for some brands that rely on cross-border fulfillment, it prolongs competitive disadvantages for U.S.-based businesses. Below, we explore the key challenges DTC brands face and potential strategies to navigate this uncertain regulatory environment.
This back-and-forth policy shift has created uncertainty, making it difficult for DTC brands to plan long-term strategies.
The de minimis rule has allowed low-cost foreign sellers to avoid import duties, enabling them to offer ultra-low prices on everything from fashion to electronics. With the delay, these platforms maintain their pricing edge over U.S. DTC brands, forcing local businesses to compete with duty-free products.
For small DTC brands, this means:
Rather than focusing solely on price, some brands may explore alternative strategies such as premium positioning, bundling, or exclusive product offerings to retain customer loyalty and avoid direct price competition.
While the China tariffs (10%) went into effect on February 4, the Canada and Mexico tariffs (25%) are paused until March, pending further neogitation. The lack of a clear timeline for de minimis suspension has created uncertainty for brands that rely on cross-border shipping and fulfillment.
Brands might evaluate whether securing warehouse space, diversifying supplier networks, or testing nearshoring options could provide resilience against future regulatory shifts.
If de minimis is eventually suspended, small DTC brands reliant on just-in-time cross-border shipping could face higher costs, additional paperwork, and customs delays.
Some brands might explore options such as storing inventory in the U.S., working with third-party logistics providers (3PLs), or evaluating alternative fulfillment models to mitigate potential disruptions.
If de minimis ends, DTC brands relying exclusively on direct-from-China shipping could be impacted the most. Some companies are already making adjustments, including:
Companies evaluating supply chain adjustments may want to factor in costs, operational feasibility, and the likelihood of long-term tariff policies before making large-scale investments.
Competing primarily on price may become more challenging for smaller brands, particularly against large-scale platforms that can absorb tariff costs. Some brands are focusing on:
Understanding customer behavior and tracking competitor pricing trends could help brands make informed adjustments without eroding profitability.
Since there is no confirmed timeline for the de minimis suspension, staying informed will be critical for brands managing inventory and logistics.
Brands monitoring policy developments might want to plan for multiple scenarios, ensuring they have the flexibility to adapt quickly if regulatory changes are implemented.
The de minimis delay provides temporary relief but does not eliminate long-term regulatory risks for small DTC brands. While Shein, Temu, and other foreign sellers continue leveraging duty-free imports, U.S.-based brands may need to explore new strategies for supply chain resilience, pricing flexibility, and competitive differentiation.
For now, DTC brands should stay informed, evaluate potential cost impacts, and consider supply chain adjustments based on their specific business needs.